In recent years, the recycled plastics market is shifting from low-cost alternatives to high-quality recycling promoted by environmental protection and carbon reduction. Argus interviewed Guo Jiawan, chairman of Guangxi Guolong, and Arnold Wang, founder of Shichai Environment, on the following topics before the Second International Rigid Polyolefin Recycling Summit hosted by Shichai Environment:
- Prospects of China’s recycled plastics exports
- Food contact applications of recycled plastics
- EU’s “mirror-clause” in the Single Use Plastics Directive, etc
How much demand do you see from export markets for your products, what are the key export markets, and for which products and end-use applications (rPET, rHDPE, rPP, Packaging grades)?
Guo: The application of recycled plastics in the packaging market is mainly driven by the demand from international brands. Large brands use environmentally friendly recycled products as a way to actively fulfill their social responsibility and promote the recycling and utilization of waste plastics through their actions. In the Chinese market, international brands have been testing and trialing small batches of recycled plastics over the past two years. In the Southeast Asia, Hong Kong and Macau markets, they have begun to introduce recycled plastic packaging products. Many international brands also have production sites in China, and their export products have started to use recycled plastics. In the personal care sector, they primarily use rHDPE and rPP, while in food packaging, rPET is the main material, all of which must meet food-grade requirements and obtain FDA or EFSA certification.
Most participants are focusing on food contact recycled materials, but China currently does not allow recyclates to be used in food-contact applications. In such a situation, how should Chinese recyclers develop their business? Would pyrolysis be an appropriate approach for Chinese recyclers to look towards?
Wang: Currently, the main applications for high-value products from Chinese PET recycling enterprises are textile fibers, industrial yarns, and other non-food grade uses. Food-grade rPET products can also meet specific needs in personal care products, and other food-grade rPET supplies include exports to Hong Kong and overseas markets.
Pyrolysis is still in the exploratory stage in China, and several commercial projects have been announced this year, but their operation will take some time and still requires market validation. On August 27-28 this year, we will have an International Rigid Polyolefin Recycling Summit in Shanghai, which will include topics related to chemical recycling and pyrolysis. Those who are interested are welcome to follow and participate.
The EU is mulling a “mirror-clause” in the Single Use Plastics Directive which would mean that recyclers from outside the EU that are sending material to the EU to count towards our recycled content targets will be held to the same feedstock, process and environmental targets as European recyclers. How do you expect this to develop and do you see any impact on your business?
Guo: [Complying with EU standards] is not difficult for Guolong Recycled Plastics, because the process technology, production equipment and environmental standards of Guolong are the same as those in Europe, as is the the use of PCR materials.
Over the past few years, Guolong have passed various tests, factory inspections, and production environment assessments required by more than twenty international brand companies, and safely met their requirements. But, if the EU pushes this policy, it might implement certification permits through factory inspections under a case-by-case basis, which might impose certain restrictions on many other recycling enterprises in China.
What is Guolong's future development target, and does Guolong plan to invest in chemical recycling in the near future?
Guo: After ten years of development, Guolong has now established sizeable capacity for producing recyclates for a range of different end-uses (see table). We have successfully implemented a business model that spans the entire industrial chain, encompassing both food-grade and industrial-grade products. Currently the company has no concrete expansion plans for the future.
| Recycling type | Capacity (t/yr) |
| Food-grade rPET | 60,000 |
| Food-grade rHDPE | 20,000 |
| Food-grade rPP | 20,000 |
| Pipe grade recyclates | 80,000 |
| Industrial grade rHDPE | 20,000 |
Do you expect to see a market start to develop for recyclates into the food packaging market in China in the near future (i.e. a change of regulation) and what other regulatory changes in China do you expect that could support the recycling industry?
Wang: China is currently researching the safety of using recycled materials in packaging applications, which includes not only recycled plastics but also recycled metals, such as whether recycled aluminum can be used for cans. The local market is also awaiting the issuance of relevant documents.
Presently, the government has introduced various policies such as the "trade-in" policy and the reverse invoicing policy, which have all promoted the expansion of the recycling industry. These allow recyclers to issue invoices to their waste suppliers (rather than the other way around), to enable recyclers to claim a VAT deduction even when the waste seller they are working with is too small to issue invoices. Government policy may also be directed towards waste classification in the future, this could be the direction for future government policy.
Of course, establishing a complete recycling system requires more implementation strategies and more time to explore development paths and undertake construction.
Spotlight content
Related news
New law to limit SM shipping into Canada
New law to limit SM shipping into Canada
Houston, 20 May (Argus) — A new shipping standard for hazardous material in Canada could limit styrene monomer (SM) shipments into the country. Transport Canada's new standard, called Containers for Transport of Dangerous Goods by Rail, went into effect on 1 May. The standard restricts SM transportation to class 117 tank cars, phasing out the previously used class 111 tank cars. Class 117 tank cars have a thicker shell and steel jacket outside the car, which provides thermal protection under the jacket to protect the tank car in the event of a fire. BNSF Railway on 24 April began rejecting any billing for tank cars that are subject to the phase-out in order to keep chemical shipments in compliance, the company said. The number of US SM sellers or distributors with class 117 tank cars is limited, meaning the standard could limit SM shipments into Canada, sources said. That could prove problematic if Shell, an SM producer in Canada, is offline long enough. Last week, [Shell declared a force majeure on SM] (https://direct.argusmedia.com/newsandanalysis/article/2689610) from its unit in Scotford, Alberta, but said they expect the plant to be back online as soon as 23 May. Only one other producer in the US, Ineos Styrolution, is known to have access to class 117 tank cars. This producer has a supply of them from their facility in Sarnia, Ontario, although that facility has been offline since April 2023 and the company plans on permanently closing it by October 2026 . The US also restricts shipping of some hazardous materials to class 117 tank cars, but the US regulation does not yet include SM. The US will restrict SM to class 117 tank cars starting 1 May 2029. By Jake Caldwell Send comments and request more information at [email protected] Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
STS methanol bunkering debuts in Amsterdam
STS methanol bunkering debuts in Amsterdam
Sao Paulo, 20 May (Argus) — The Port of Amsterdam has completed its first ship-to-ship (STS) methanol bunkering operation, marking a key milestone in the port's decarbonisation strategy. The operation involved supplying Van Oord's offshore installation vessel Boreas with 500t of green methanol at the TMA Logistic terminal. The bunkering was carried out by the Chicago, with the fuel supplied by OCI HyFuels, a producer of renewable methanol products such as biomethanol and bio-MTBE. The Boreas is the first newly built offshore installation vessel designed to operate on methanol. Methanol is gaining traction as a viable low-carbon option for ships to use to comply with regulations on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The EU's FuelEU Maritime regulation, which took effect in January this year, mandates a phased reduction in GHG intensity for vessels operating in EU waters — starting with a 2pc cut this year, increasing to 6pc by 2030 and reaching 80pc by 2050, relative to 2020 levels. By Natália Coelho Send comments and request more information at [email protected] Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Phillips 66 vote could change company's course
Phillips 66 vote could change company's course
Houston, 19 May (Argus) — Just four of Phillips 66's 14 board members are up for election at its annual meeting this week, but the outcome could shape the future direction of the US refiner and midstream operator. Activist hedge fund Elliott Investment Management has named four of its own candidates for the vote which will come to a conclusion on 21 May, part of its multi-year effort to push the company to sell assets and focus on core businesses. Elliott, which has amassed a $2.5bn stake in Phillips 66, contends that the company has consistently trailed its industry peers and needs to streamline operations, including spinning off or selling its midstream business, selling its stake in Chevron Phillips Chemical (CPChem), and possibly other assets. Phillips 66 has told shareholders that Elliot is pushing "an aggressive short-term agenda" that would cause disruption, slow momentum and jeopardize shareholders' investments. It says the Phillips 66 board and management team are implementing a "transformative strategy" that has delivered results, expanded its NGL business, improved its refining cost structure and continues to position CPChem as the lowest cost producer of ethylene. "We don't act out of fear or short-term trends," Phillips 66 chief executive office Mark Lashier said in a first quarter earnings call last month. "We act on what we believe will create the most long-term value for our shareholders each and every time." Turning up the heat Elliott alleges that Phillips 66 suffers from "continuous poor corporate governance" and "disingenuous shareholder engagement." Elliott said its proposals could push Phillips 66 stock to more than $200 per share. The stock was trading near $124 per share Monday morning. Elliott's campaign has grown more aggressive in the months leading up to this week's shareholder meeting. It includes launching a website dubbed "Streamline 66" with slide shows, podcasts, biographies of its dissident board nominees, press releases and information on how shareholders can vote by mail, phone or online. Elliott nominees include Brian Coffman, former chief executive at Motiva; Sigmund Cornelius, former chief financial officer of ConocoPhillips; Michael Heim, former chief operating officer of Targa Resources; and Stacy Nieuwoudt, former energy analyst at Citadel. Three top shareholder advisory firms are backing the Elliott nominees in the proxy fight. Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Egan-Jones are recommending all four of Elliot's dissident nominees, while Glass Lewis is backing three of the four — and supporting Phillips 66 nominee Nigel Hearne, a 35-year veteran of Chevron, because his experience "is more critical at this juncture". Phillips 66 pushback Phillips 66 has made some adjustments since Elliot started to agitate for change. In February 2024 it appointed former Motiva and Cenovus downstream executive Robert Pease to the board to address Elliott's concerns about a shift in focus from refining to midstream. And this year it agreed to sell off some of its European retail business , and expects about $1.6bn in pre-tax cash proceeds from the sale that it will use toward debt reduction and shareholder returns. But for the other Elliott recommendations to divest from midstream and sell its 50pc share of CPChem, Phillips 66 said the board has evaluated them and "came to the conclusion that neither action is in the best interest of long-term shareholders at this time". In additon to Hearne, Phillips 66's slate for the open board seats includes putting up Pease and current director John Lowe for re-election and nominating Howard Ungerleider, a former Dow president and chief financial officer. Current board members Gary Adams and Denise Ramos will not stand for re-election. Analysts with US bank TD Cowen said they "suspect Elliott could get some or all of its board members elected" and there could be larger board turnover next year if shareholders approve an Elliott proposal to require each director to submit a resignation to the board every year. The most likely outcome of an Elliott win is that the board "more deeply examines a midstream restructuring", TD Cowen said. By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at [email protected] Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
PETCORE Europe Thermoforms: Collection is key
PETCORE Europe Thermoforms: Collection is key
London, 16 May (Argus) — Ahead of the Petcore Europe Thermoforms Conference in Dijon, France on 27-28 May, the technical manager of Petcore Europe's thermoforming working group, Jose-Antonio Alarcon, spoke to Argus about progress in the European tray-to-tray recycling market. Since we attended the annual event last year in Granada, Spain what has changed for the market? We don't see big changes. Collection is mostly the same, but there have been some developments on recycling projects. The appetite for recycling of tray-to-tray is growing. We have seen more players coming to operate in the tray-to-tray market over the last year, and more capacity is expected to start during this year. Petcore are aiming to make an study of the state of play for the thermoform industry in Europe to have a clear view on the real market size and the final application usage. The distribution between the food contact and non-food contacts, and also between mono and multi-layer, are essential for us and will be discussed in France. Following on from the success of last year's conference, what topics and discussions are you hoping will come up at this year's event? We want to keep energising the market, and building on the momentum. We have five pillars in the thermoforming working group that will be represented at the conference supporting the initiatives in the market. The first one is collection and sorting. If the material is not collected, it is not sorted, it is not recycled, period. We will be visiting a state-of-the-art sorting centre where they separate bottles and trays into mono- and multi-layer streams. The main challenge is how can these best practices be expanded to the rest of Europe. The second is recycling technologies. This is important, because you cannot use the same technologies for recycling bottle and trays because the physical properties of trays are not the same as bottles. Trays are often thinner and more brittle, they generate more dust and need to be treated more gently. Third is food contact, because we need to get the food contact trays back and into the closed loop. The majority of tray packaging placed on the market is in food contact applications, but there is not currently much progress on separate tray collection. There is work to be done in that direction. Then we have design for recycling and standardisation. If you don't design properly for recycling, then it will be very difficult for the market to scale up. And lastly is communication. Consumers need to know that trays can be recycled just like bottles, and we need people engaged. We also have presentations from the European Commission and legislative specialists as this is an important factor in the outlook for the market. Last year there was no specific legislation dedicated to thermoforms. Now we have the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) that passed into legislation and has mandated recycle content targets. So is this a positive? There are some positives and negatives. Yes, in the PPWR there is mandated recycled content targets for contact sensitive and non-contact sensitive packaging that will directly impact the tray market. Of course, this should move more people toward the use of tray flake and towards separate collection for tray. One of the impacts of legislation is that a lot of countries are moving to deposit return scheme (DRS) collection on bottles, which is deducting a lot of bottle from the regular yellow bin collection. So there will be a higher proportion of tray coming from this collection which could be a good opportunity for the circularity of trays if this waste is managed properly. And the recycled content targets should give a demand boost to the tray-to-tray market. We also have recycled content targets into bottles from the Single Use Plastics Directive (SUPD) meaning more and more bottle flakes are going back to bottles so that's a good opportunity for tray flakes. PPWR targets 30pc recycled content for contact sensitive packaging and 35pc for non-contact sensitive packaging by 2030. Will Europe be able to reach these targets in the tray market? It could, and it is possible, but it is ambitious. At this time, we are a long way from that point on tray-to-tray and it is very complicated. If we look to the bottle market, these percentages are achievable. Around 70pc of bottles are collected on average in Europe, but less than 30pc of trays. If we achieve similar collection volumes for trays then around 30pc recycled content should be feasible. But it will be challenging. At the moment bottle flake prices are at a significant premium to the virgin PET, which is impacting demand particularly in thermoforming applications and other cost saving markets like strapping and fibre. What impact could this have for PET tray flakes? People try to minimise their impact on the balance sheet, bottom line so less competitive prices versus virgin for rPET bottle flakes and pellets could spur more interest in tray. And maybe with the additional demand for bottle flake or food grade pellets from legislation and recycled content targets, people are looking for an alternative source so that they're not having to compete with that bottle flake market. But for PETCORE the focus is not on cost, our intention is that every package place on the market is collected, sorted and recycled. Over the last 12 months, we've seen quite a few chemical recycling projects being delayed or deferred. Is the difficult business environment across the whole industry an additional challenge for scaling up tray-to-tray? Of course there are challenges. We need to look at how the bottle recycling market has changed in the past 15 years with collection, technology, volume, quality, capacity etc., and the tray market is much later in the in the evolution, so it will take some time in order to achieve a similar situation as the bottle market. Of course, we expect that the speed of acceleration to reach the point of maturity to be faster for trays because we can take some learnings from previous experiences. Five years ago, trays were considered a contaminant at bottle sorting plants, and what we see today is that trays have the possibility to be a properly recycled stream providing another outlet of waste for sorters and recyclers. We need the material to be collected and it will require investment of course. The current infrastructure may be sufficient if managed properly. To increase the number of streams collected and volumes there may not be the need to invest in new infrastructure but just to boost current infrastructures. Chemical recycling is also part of the picture. There is a place for everyone, and mechanical and chemical are absolutely complementary. At the end of the day, we need to try to recover as much material as possible, then minimise the use of virgin resources so we know streams that can be as effective as possible. Send comments and request more information at [email protected] Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
