Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

S Korea to convert half of existing coal fleet to gas

  • Market: Coal, Electricity
  • 11/05/20

The closure or conversion of ageing South Korean coal-fired power plants could cut power sector consumption by 19mn-28mn t/yr by 2034, although the decline may be slowed in the near term by the start-up of new plants in the next five years.

South Korea plans to shut a total of 15.3GW of coal-fired capacity by 2034, according to a draft of the country's ninth basic electricity plan released on 7 May, of which 12.7GW will be switched to run on LNG. South Korean state-owned Kepco utilities currently operate 33.7GW of coal capacity across 56 units.

Some 30 of those coal units that reach 30 years of service by 2034 will be retired, 24 of which will be converted to run on natural gas, according to the draft. The exact units to be converted were not specified, but are likely to comprise power plants earmarked for conversion by the five individual state-owned utilities.

The existing eighth electricity plan already includes the conversion of the 500MW Dangjin 1 and 2 units to run on gas in 2029, with the 560MW Samcheonpo 3 and 4 units to be retired in March 2023 and the 500MW Taean 1 and 2 units scheduled to close in 2025.

In addition, Korea East-West Power has proposed the conversion of its 500MW Dangjin 3 and 4 in 2030, according to board meeting notes published on its website.

Fellow state-owned utility Korea South East Power (Koen) has proposed converting its 500MW Samcheonpo units 5 and 6 in July 2027 and January 2028, respectively, and its 800MW Youngheung units 1 and 2 in June 2034 and December 2034. Koen's 560MW Samcheonpo units 1 and 2 are already scheduled to retire as part of the eighth plan.

Korea Southern Power (Kospo) plans to convert a total of 3GW of ageing coal capacity across six units in 2026-31. Kospo's meeting notes do not specify the exact units to be converted, but the 500MW Hadong units 1-6 are the oldest in its fleet. Kospo is already scheduled to retire its 250MW Honam units 1 and 2 in January 2021.

Korea Western Power's (Kowepo) 500MW Taean units 3 and 4 have been proposed for conversion to LNG in December 2032 and Korea Midland Power's (Komipo) 500MW Boryeong units 5 and 6 in December 2024 and December 2025, respectively. The 500MW Boryeong units 1 and 2 are scheduled to close in December this year as part of the eighth plan, but Komipo has decided to convert the units to run on LNG in December 2026, according to board meeting minutes.

But despite the swathe of plant retirements and fuel conversions, seven new coal units are currently under construction with a combined capacity of 7.26GW. This means that South Korea's installed coal capacity will likely peak around 2024-25, potentially slowing the decline in coal burn until later this decade.

State-owned utilities consumed 83.3mn t of coal (with an unspecified calorific value) to generate 226.8TWh in 2019, according to Kepco data. This represented a 71pc utilisation rate of the country's state-owned fleet, down from 75pc in 2018. Coal-fired load factors may remain under pressure in the coming years, as the government has pledged to restrict the use of coal plants to improve air quality during the peak winter heating season each year. Increasingly competitive gas prices and rising nuclear and renewable capacity may also stem the use of coal plants.

If the use of South Korea's installed state-owned coal capacity ranges between 60pc and 70pc, annual coal consumption for power could drop to as low as 53mn-62mn t/yr in 2034, according to Argus analysis. But annual power sector demand is set to average around 80mn t/yr in the next five years, assuming a 70pc average load each year, as new capacity additions will outpace retirements in the near term. But the record 89.3mn t of consumption recorded in 2018 may be unlikely to be repeated.

Ninth plan targets renewables growth

The government — recently strengthened by the success of President Moon Jae-in's party in last month's national assembly elections — is targeting a 62.3GW increase in renewable capacity by 2034, in line with a previous target set out in the third energy plan.

This would bring total renewable capacity to around 79GW, which the government expects to represent around 40pc of the country's installed capacity, compared with 15pc now. The ninth plan sees coal, nuclear and gas-fired capacity accounting for 14.9pc, 9.9pc and 31pc, respectively, by 2034.

The increase in renewable generation would offset declines in coal, gas and nuclear generation and cater for growth in overall power demand. The eighth plan targeted a 24 percentage point increase in renewables' share of power generation to 33.7pc by 2030, with coal, gas and nuclear shares falling by around nine, five and seven percentage points. The targets in the ninth plan — to be confirmed in the second half of the year — may now be even tougher on coal.

Change in Korean generation mix 2019-34 GW

South Korean coal burn vs installed capacity mn t, GW

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
27/06/25

Bonn climate talks leave mountain to climb for Belem

Bonn climate talks leave mountain to climb for Belem

Deepening divisions between developed and developing countries promise to make Cop 30 an arduous summit, writes Rhys Talbot Paris, 27 June (Argus) — Progress in technical discussions at the UN climate conference in Bonn, Germany, still leaves much work for the incoming Brazilian presidency ahead of November's Cop 30 summit in Belem if it is to deliver a strong outcome on emission cuts. After a rocky start in Bonn this month, with a two-day fight over the agenda, negotiators delivered texts across a number of areas relating to emission reductions. The Brazilian Cop takes place 10 years after the Paris agreement, in which states agreed to limit global warming to well below 2°C and preferably 1.5°C, and two years after Cop 28 in Dubai, when they undertook the global stocktake (GST) to measure progress on reaching Paris goals and pledged to phase out fossil fuels. The annual Bonn talks are intended to allow negotiators to prepare the ground for political decisions to be made at Cop. But this year, even those discussions that have advanced well have tended to produce large texts with many mutually exclusive options in brackets, reflecting incompatible positions that will have to be worked out by policy makers between now and the end of the Belem Cop. The main arena for considering fossil fuels, a discussion of the meaning of the GST, has left a heavily divided text to Belem. Developed countries have argued for a longer, more extensive process, while some parties — including China, India and Saudi Arabia — have tried to limit the scope, duration and outputs of the sessions. And the texts do not directly address the elephant in the room — countries are this year delivering their nationally determined contribution (NDC) documents laying out their plans to cut emissions. Those plans are likely to be insufficient to limit global warming to 1.5°C. And the Brazilian presidency will have to grasp the initiative to find a way to ensure advances on the Paris and Dubai goals. The leader's summit to be held immediately before Cop could offer a chance for movement. The release of a keenly awaited synthesis report of NDCs on 24 October could offer a spur to this summit. "People will want a reaction from our leaders" when the report comes out, Cop 30 executive director Ana Toni said. But Brazil rejects the idea of a cover decision at the end of Belem as a home for discussion of fossil fuels. And the presidency has been reluctant to attack fossil fuels head on. "This is not an item of negotiation, the GST is," Toni said. Brazil must wrangle a fractious conference including major fossil fuel producers such as India, Saudi Arabia and Russia which resist any action on the topic, as well as facing criticism over its own plans to increase oil and gas production . Climate finance fight Climate finance permeated the Bonn talks, with developing countries trying to steer various work programmes towards the issue, while developed countries attempted to limit discussion. Developing countries said the finance settlement reached last year at Baku does not meet developed countries' obligations under the Paris agreement, as well as being far short of actual needs. And in parallel, they expressed their frustration with carbon border adjust mechanism (CBAM)-type arrangements planned for the EU and UK, and projected for Canada. Developed countries see these as essential to protecting their domestic industry and preventing carbon leakage, given their high carbon costs, but developing countries say the costs will fall mostly on them. These two issues appear likely to crop up again as stumbling blocks at Belem that the presidency will have to tackle with political engagement beforehand. Brazil has promoted Cop 30 as an "implementation" Cop, with no one particular agenda item dominating. This gives the country the arduous task of having to make concrete progress on many items, rather than focus on one headline target. Send comments and request more information at [email protected] Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Ofgem extends UK fuel mix disclosure deadline: Sources


27/06/25
News
27/06/25

Ofgem extends UK fuel mix disclosure deadline: Sources

London, 27 June (Argus) — UK energy regulator Ofgem has extended its annual fuel mix disclosure (FMD) deadline for electricity suppliers to 22 July from the previous 1 July, owing to ongoing technological issues with its new Renewable Electricity Register, according to renewable energy guarantees of origin (Rego) market participants citing letters they received from Ofgem. UK suppliers typically must disclose by 1 July each year the mix of fuels they have used to generate the electricity they provide to customers during the compliance period — which runs from April to March. Regos prove that the electricity came from renewable energy sources and suppliers must hold this evidence in their accounts by the deadline. Ofgem launched a new electronic registry in May, but ongoing technological issues have prevented some counterparties from receiving their Regos in time to meet the deadline, market participants said. Thus, Ofgem pushed the deadline back to 22 July. Ofgem has been contacted for comment but has not yet confirmed this decision. Non-biomass Regos from the previous compliance period (CP23), which can be redeemed until the FMD deadline, have climbed by £0.40/MWh in the past two weeks, according to Argus assessments, with demand having kept steady at a time when most volumes have already found buyers. Argus last assessed the contract at £0.50/MWh on 26 June. By Giulio Bajona Send comments and request more information at [email protected] Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

EQT to ‘limit’ hedged volumes to 50pc of its gas


25/06/25
News
25/06/25

EQT to ‘limit’ hedged volumes to 50pc of its gas

New York, 25 June (Argus) — US natural gas producer EQT only plans to use financial derivatives to lock in prices for half of its output at the most in the coming years, a break from years' past when it was hedging the vast majority of its volumes. The second-largest US gas producer by volume would need to have "conviction" on its outlook for US gas prices in order for it to hedge a full 50pc of its volumes, EQT chief executive Toby Rice told Argus in an interview Wednesday in New York City. "I think that would be a limit," Rice said. EQT remains entirely unhedged for 2026, he said. Without a clear sense of the trajectory of the US gas market — a famously volatile market which has only become more volatile in recent years — EQT believes erring on the side of maximum exposure to spot prices will lead to higher average revenue. EQT made $68mn on its derivatives contracts in 2024 and $1.8bn in 2023, according to federal regulatory filings. This was after losing $4.6bn on derivatives in 2022 after Russia invaded Ukraine, sending US gas prices near $10/mmBtu, heights from which EQT was partly locked out because of its hedges. EQT's unhedged strategy is a departure from when Rice was appointed chief executive in 2019 in a bid by activist investors to overhaul the company's board of directors and change its strategy. At that time, EQT was hedging up to 80pc of volumes, largely due to its higher cost structure, Rice said. But now, with EQT able to break even with US gas prices as low as $2.45/mmBtu — excluding its interest payments on its debt — hedging has become an "entirely opportunistic" tool for EQT, rather than a defensive necessity, he said. The prompt-month settlement price for Nymex gas at the US benchmark Henry Hub so far this month has averaged $3.67/mmBtu. EQT is also able to hedge less of its gas because it has increased the amount of gas it can move to consumers outside its core operating area in Appalachia. EQT sells more than 4.6 Bcf/d directly to end users, including power companies and utilities, local distribution companies and LNG export terminals, according to a confidential investor slide obtained by Argus . Of that, 3 Bcf/d goes to power and utility companies including NextEra Energy, Duke Energy, Southern Company and Constellation Energy; 1 Bcf/d goes to local distribution companies including Illinois-based Peoples Energy, Washington, DC-based WGL Holdings and New Jersey Natural Gas; and 600mn cf/d goes to LNG facilities including Venture Global, Sabine Pass, Cameron LNG and Berkshire Hathaway's Cove Point LNG. Moving gas from Appalachia to population centers elsewhere in the country, where gas prices are higher, has historically been a challenge for Appalachian producers because of opposition from state regulatory agencies to the construction of new interstate pipelines. EQT has been able to overcome this challenge in part by signing long-term supply agreements with southeast utilities Duke and Southern for 1.2 Bcf/d of gas, which will be shipped on EQT's Mountain Valley Pipeline, as Argus reported earlier this month. Gas buyers have become more interested in signing long-term supply deals with EQT as heightened volatility in the US gas market has increasingly lured in commodity traders who act as middlemen, Rice said. Switzerland-based commodity trader Glencore and New York-based quantitative trading firm Jane Street, among others, have been building up a US gas trading presence over the past year. IRA rollback could boost gas demand Rice also sees bright spots for gas amid an effort by Republicans in the US Congress to use a filibuster-proof budget bill to phase out clean energy tax credits from former president Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. If Republicans get their way, this could slow the growth of US renewable energy generation, "easily" boosting US gas demand by 1.5-2 Bcf/d by 2030 as gas takes market share from what would have otherwise been occupied by renewables, Rice said. "If solar and wind investments decrease, that [energy] demand's not going away," Rice said. EQT also expects planned data centers running artificial intelligence software to increase US gas demand by 4-6 Bcf/d over the period, he said. EQT is in discussions with "roughly a dozen proposed power projects" in Appalachia on an expected surge in US power demand, only about 40pc of which stems from planned data centers, Rice said. Rice still expects to announce a gas supply agreement involving one of these projects by the end of the year. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at [email protected] Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump says Iran will not restart enrichment


25/06/25
News
25/06/25

Trump says Iran will not restart enrichment

Dubai, 25 June (Argus) — US President Donald Trump today said he would "militarily" prevent Iran from restarting uranium enrichment or pursuing a nuclear weapon. It is unclear how much damage to Tehran's nuclear programme was caused by the US recent airstrikes on the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan facilities. "The last thing they want to do is enrich anything right now," Trump said today. "They want to recover, and we won't let that [enrichment] happen… militarily, we won't." "They're not going to have a bomb, and they're not going to enrich," he said. Trump was responding to remarks by Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araqchi, who said Tehran will not abandon uranium enrichment and that Iran's perspective on the nuclear non-proliferation regime is undergoing a change. Trump brokered a ceasefire to end a 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, which appears to be holding. On Tuesday, 24 June, he had sharply criticised both countries over what he called early violations of the truce. Trump also said the US could eventually have a relationship with Iran. "I see it. Look I've had a relationship over the last four days," he said. "They agreed to the ceasefire, and it was a very equal agreement [between Iran and Israel]." That followed an earlier upbeat assessment of Iran's economic future. "They're going to get on to being the great trading nation," Trump said. Extent of damage The full extent of damage to Iran's nuclear facilities caused by US bombing has yet to be verified. Trump has said the sites were completely demolished, calling the outcome of the attack "very severe" and "obliteration." UN nuclear watchdog IAEA director general Rafael Grossi said the US strikes had set back Iran's nuclear program "significantly", but did not specify what that meant in terms of months or years. Secretary of state Marco Rubio said Iran's conversion facility, a necessary element for producing a nuclear weapon, had been obliterated. "You can't even find where it used to be because the whole thing… is gone," he said. Iran has yet to comment about the extent of damage. By Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at [email protected] Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Iran’s nuclear programme set back 'significantly': IAEA


25/06/25
News
25/06/25

Iran’s nuclear programme set back 'significantly': IAEA

Dubai, 25 June (Argus) — US strikes have set back Iran's nuclear programme "significantly", but the location of nearly 900 pounds (408 kg) of potentially enriched Iranian uranium is not known, UN nuclear watchdog (IAEA) director General Rafael Grossi said. Grossi told Fox News that the agency is waiting to see what Iran decides to do and whether the country is going to reconstruct the nuclear facilities. "For example, [if] there is a resumption, as I hope personally, of the negotiation with [US special envoy Steve] Witkoff, where there was an idea that Iran would not be enriching and would perhaps be part of an international consortium," Grossi said. The full extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities following US strikes has yet to be verified, even though US president Donald Trump insisted the sites were completely demolished . "As inspectors, we say what we can check and verify," Grossi said, adding that what the agency currently sees is "a very important degree of damage in all three facilities." Asked about his previous statement on 900 pounds of potentially enriched uranium having been moved to an old site near Esfahan, Grossi said he could not speculate as they do not know where the material is located. He said that Iran told the IAEA that they would be taking protective measures "which may or may not include moving this material". The only way to confirm is "to allow the inspection activity to resume as soon as possible", he said. But Iran's parliament today approved "the generalities of a plan requiring the government to suspend its cooperation with the IAEA," according to state news agency Irna. The motion still requires the endorsement of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) — Iran's highest security authority. "According to the resolution, IAEA inspectors do not have the right to enter the country for inspections without the explicit approval of the SNSC," reported Nour News, an Iranian agency linked to Ali Shamkhani, top military and nuclear adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iran's current parliamentary speaker, conservative Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, said today that Iran's peaceful nuclear program "will advance at an even faster pace [than before]." By Bachar Halabi and Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at [email protected] Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more
OSZAR »